Harley Singh Grooves

Camshafts, pistons, cylinder heads & valvetrain, anything fuel economy for engines

Moderator: Site Moderators

Harley Singh Grooves

Postby t120r » Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:34 pm

Hey guys. My first project in fuel economy is gong to be with my 2003 Harley Sportster. It already gets 3.5l/100km, but I have the Edelbrock 1200cc conversion kit. So I'll be increasing the displacement from 883cc to 1200cc and also increasing compression from 9:1 to 10.5:1. Now this kit as delivered is pretty detonation resistant... For a Harley anyway.:) . I already have the pistons coated with a thermal barrier and I will be doing the same to combustion chamber, valve faces and exhaust runner/port. Soon I will be ripping the cylinders off to be rebored for the new pistons, so the heads have to be ready to go. Basically what I need to know is what the optimal quench is for the singh grooves. By removing the base gasket I'm told I should come into a squish band somewhere in between 0.030" and 0.040", which comes out to about 11.2:1 compression ratio. Will the be too small of a gap for them to work? I really don't want to shave down my new heads to increase compression. Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
t120r
Vacuum Gauge Member
Vacuum Gauge Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:17 am

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby mpgmike » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:52 pm

0.030" - 0.040" is a bit thin for the Groove to work properly. It would help if you could post pics of your pistons and combustion chamber. The Somender Grooves are just a tool. They accomplish something. What they accomplish is determined by how you use them. Let's see what you're working with.

Mike
I've never felt like "I made it". I just keep making it better every day.
User avatar
mpgmike
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Wherever the action is

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby t120r » Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:08 am

Here is a pic of the chamber. I should have zoomed out a bit more. If it's not enough, let me know and I'll take another one.
The pistons in this kit are specially made by JE for Edelbrock. The dome (10cc after radius & polish) is designed to fit the head pocket. These are already done with thermal barrier coating, so I won't be touching them again.

Image
t120r
Vacuum Gauge Member
Vacuum Gauge Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:17 am

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby Pinhead » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:20 pm

I would "edge" that chamber in addition to adding Singh Grooves. There's a lot of improvement to be had. I'll wait for Mike to suggest groove position of the groove(s), though, as he has MUCH more experience. :)
1999 F150 4x4 5.4L V8 4-speed Auto, 4" lift, 33" tires -> 14/17mpg
1979 Honda CB650, 627cc SOHC4 => 65/47mpg.
Image
Pinhead
Inventor
Inventor
 
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:26 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby t120r » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:55 pm

Oy yes. The chamber needs to have the edges radiused for sure. I have a dremel I was going to use for it, but instead I am going to use an air diegrinder with a rolox pad. That will make a much nicer/smoother job.
t120r
Vacuum Gauge Member
Vacuum Gauge Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:17 am

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby mpgmike » Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:03 pm

I would add 2 grooves per cylinder; one behind the spark plug, aimed at the spark plug, and one opposite the plug, aimed just toward the exhaust side of the spark plug. +1 on the radiusing.

Mike
I've never felt like "I made it". I just keep making it better every day.
User avatar
mpgmike
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
 
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Wherever the action is

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby t120r » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:03 am

Thanks for the advice. The more I think about it, the more I am contimplating shaving the head down a bit. Every 0.010" milled off will bring roughly 1.1cc out of the chamber. Basically with the radiusing and the singh grooves, I could shave off 3cc or so and still come out with a touch more compression.
t120r
Vacuum Gauge Member
Vacuum Gauge Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:17 am

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby daves66nova » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:16 am

So how did this run after all?
daves66nova
Fuel Additive Member
Fuel Additive Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby Pinhead » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:02 am

I'm curious as well. And always enjoy looking at combustion chamber porn. :D :mrgreen:
1999 F150 4x4 5.4L V8 4-speed Auto, 4" lift, 33" tires -> 14/17mpg
1979 Honda CB650, 627cc SOHC4 => 65/47mpg.
Image
Pinhead
Inventor
Inventor
 
Posts: 910
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:26 am
Location: Kansas City

Re: Harley Singh Grooves

Postby threepiston » Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:00 am

Me too, as I have an 03 sportster in the barn available to me for cheap.....

Combustion chamber porn... LOL. I like engine porn.... I don't just have a chamber fetish....
User avatar
threepiston
Fuel Additive Member
Fuel Additive Member
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:53 am
Location: Illinois

Next

Return to Engines

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest